Manager versus Machine H1 2025: Trump makes (some) active funds great again

Laith Khalaf
29 July 2025
  • Active funds break records in H1 2025, both positive and negative
  • Just 30% of active funds beat a comparable index tracker over the last ten years, a record low for the Manager versus Machine report
  • And yet active Global funds posted their best performance against the passive machines in 2025 to date, as did funds investing in US equities
  • Active managers investing in the UK let the side down, with just 29% outperforming in the first half of the year
  • Weak mid and small cap performance may be a headwind for the long term performance of active managers for years to come
  • A copy of the full report can be found here

Laith Khalaf, head of investment analysis at AJ Bell, comments:

“It looks like Donald Trump has done what years of toil and sweat have failed to achieve, namely some measure of outperformance from global active funds. In the first half of 2025, 51% of active funds in the Global sector outperformed a passive alternative. That’s according to our latest Manager versus Machine report, which analyses over 1,000 funds across seven key Investment Association sectors. This is the first time since we launched the Manager versus Machine report in 2021 that global active managers have registered anywhere near a win rate above 50% against the passive machines, on any of the time frames we look at. The previous high water mark for global active fund managers to hang their rather battered hats on came in December 2021, when 40% of them beat a passive alternative over a five year period.

Table: % of active funds outperforming the average passive alternative

Sources: AJ Bell, Morningstar total return in GBP to 30 June 2025

“Trump has helped create the conditions for global active funds to outperform through policies which have weakened the dollar and dented confidence in US stocks, at last in the first half of the year. As a result the US has uncharacteristically lagged other regional stock markets since the beginning of 2025, especially when performance is converted into pounds and pence, as the table shows. Most global active fund managers are underweight the US compared to their tracker competitors, a position which has been a powerful headwind for many years, but which has put some wind in their sails so far in 2025.

Table: Regional market indices compared

Sources: FE, total return in GBP to 30 June 2025

“There has been a parallel disturbance within the US stock market itself, which has helped US equity fund managers outperform to a higher degree than we have seen in previous Manager versus Machine reports. Some of the Magnificent Seven have been a big drag on index fund performance so far this year, which has opened the door for active managers with broader portfolios to score some points against the passive machines. 44% of active US funds outperformed a comparable tracker in the first half of the year, again a record high for this sector since we started compiling the data in 2021.

“Active management in the Global and US sectors may have perked up in 2025, but it’s been a dismal year so far for active managers investing in the UK stock market, where only 29% managed to beat the average index tracker. This poor performance can largely be laid at the door of mid and small caps lagging behind the big blue chips of the FTSE 100, combined with the fact active managers tend to be underweight large caps compared to a plain vanilla index tracking fund.

The really bad news for active managers

“But here comes the really bad news for active managers: over the last ten years, just 30% of active funds across all seven equity sectors in our analysis have outperformed a passive alternative. This is the worst ten year reading we have seen since we started compiling Manager versus Machine in 2021. The aggregate figure for all funds is heavily influenced by performance in the Global, North America, and UK fund sectors, as these segments make up almost two thirds of all the active funds analysed over a ten year period. Conditions over the last decade have been bleak in these sectors for active managers, with only 31% outperforming in the UK, 17% in the Global sector and 15% in the US.

“It’s unfair to describe this latest low water mark plumbed by active funds as a step change in long term performance, given it’s only a few percentage points shy of what we’ve seen in recent years, as the chart below shows. However there’s no doubt that such sustained underperformance, combined with a number of structural fund buying trends, is driving large herds of investors towards the comforting, low cost simplicity of passive funds.

Chart: Manager versus Machine since 2021

Source: AJ Bell Manager versus Machine reports 2021 through to 2025

A glimpse into the future of managers versus machines

“The poor long term performance of active funds in the North America and Global sectors sits at odds with their surprisingly perky demeanour so far in 2025. This demonstrates that even if active managers start to turn things around, it’s going to take a considerable period of widespread outperformance to overturn the dominance of index trackers in the long term numbers.

“One of the things we have continually highlighted in this report is the impact of large, mid and small cap performance on the fortunes of active managers. Tracker funds will usually be more heavily weighted to large cap stocks than the typical active fund, and active funds will tend to be more overweight medium and smaller companies. When big companies do well compared to their more modestly sized peers, active funds tend to fare poorly, and index trackers rule the roost.

“Unfortunately for active managers, in the last twenty years we’ve witnessed small and midcap outperformance give way to the dominance of the big blue chips and that’s particularly the case in the last five years (see chart below - bars above the x axis show large caps outperforming, bars below the x axis show mid and small caps outperforming). A similar trend can be seen in the UK and US stock market. The upshot is it’s still a long uphill battle for active managers to fight back against the passives in terms of ten year performance, unless we get a spell when mid and small caps post some powerful outperformance of big blue chip companies.

“Ultimately this dynamic may well catch up with the passive machines in due course, as the recent market leadership of the biggest stocks in the index falls out of the equation. But for ten year performance figures, that won’t be until the mid 2030s. Given current fund flows into trackers and out of active strategies, the battle between active and passive funds may well have been largely settled by then, in practical terms at least.”

Chart: Performance of global large caps versus mid and small caps

Sources: AJ Bell, Morningstar, total return to 30 June 2025

 

Laith Khalaf
Head of Investment Analysis

Laith Khalaf started his career in 2001, after studying philosophy at Cambridge University. He’s worked in a variety of roles across pensions and investments, covering both the DIY and the advised sides of the business. In 2007, he began to focus on research and analysis, and has since become a leading industry commentator, as well as a regular contributor to the financial pages of the national press. He’s a frequent guest on TV and radio, and for several years provided daily business bulletins on LBC.

Contact details

Mobile: 07936 963 267
Email: laith.khalaf@ajbell.co.uk

Follow us: