Markets get ready for NVIDIA’s first-quarter results

Russ Mould
23 May 2025
  • NVIDIA share price has rallied but is yet to return to 2024’s all-time high
  • Q1 results from AI chipset provider will show scars from Trump’s trade and tariff policies
  • Company has already warned of $5.5 billion hit to results, although market will focus on the underlying figures
  • Balance sheet could give clues if there is any change in momentum in demand

“Global stock markets have rallied hard and one major source of support has been the so-called Magnificent Seven of Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Tesla and NVIDIA, whose collective stock market capitalisation of $16.6 trillion is 10% below the peak reached on Christmas Eve last year and more than a quarter above the low reached on 8 April,” says AJ Bell investment director Russ Mould.

“The stage is therefore set for Wednesday 28th May’s first-quarter results from NVIDIA, which is currently the second-largest company by stock market capitalisation in the world, behind only Microsoft.

Source: LSEG Refinitiv data

“This is the next test of whether the Magnificent Seven can push on to new highs, although their inability to do so as yet may lie with how investors continue to ponder the implications of January’s launch of the R1 Large Language Model by China’s DeepSeek.

“Trump’s tariffs and trade policies are blotting out many other issues right now, but this one is yet to go away. The product challenged the consensus view that Artificial Intelligence required more – more chipsets, more computing and server power and more energy – and AI-related stocks have yet to fully recover their poise.

“Super Micro Computer has dished out a profit warning, and even written down the value of some inventory, while CoreWeave disappointed with guidance for its next quarter when it released its maiden quarterly results earlier this month (not that the share price cared).

Source: LSEG Refinitiv data

“NVIDIA did offer fairly cautious guidance for the first quarter, which runs from February to April, but it has had the happy knack of beating estimates for the quarter, even if some are tempted to accuse chief executive Jensen Huang of intentionally sandbagging the numbers, so he can deliver the expected, even required, upside surprise.

“Either way, the first-quarter number will be benchmarked against the guidance given by Mr Huang alongside the full-year results back in February. Just as important will be any guidance for the second quarter, which runs from May through to July.

“For the first quarter, NVIDIA has sales to $43 billion, some 70% above the $22.1 billion achieved in the same period a year ago. The analysts’ consensus for the second quarter is $45.4 billion.

Source: Company accounts, Marketscreener, management guidance for Q1 2025E, analysts’ consensus estimates. Financial year to January.

“Guidance for gross margin is a range of 70.6% to 71.0%. That is down from 78% a year ago and implies that cost of sales will more than double year-on-year (hence the accusations that Mr Huang may be sandbagging the numbers).

“Add in operating expenses of $5.2 billion, other financial income of $400 million and tax rate of around 17% and you get to the headline earnings per share, or EPS, figure of $0.88 a share for the first quarter. That compares to $0.61 a year ago and implies a net profit of around $21.4 billion, below the outcome in the fourth quarter, which some, again, may see as conservative. These numbers exclude the projected $5.5 billion in tariff-and-trade related write-downs.

“For the second quarter, by the way, the consensus EPS estimate of $1.00, up from $0.68 in the same period a year ago. That equates to net income of around $23.4 billion.

Source: Company accounts, Marketscreener, management guidance for Q1 2025E, analysts’ consensus estimates. Financial year to January.

“More strategically, analysts will doubtless look for comments from Mr Huang on tariffs, America’s restrictions on Chinese buying of leading-edge silicon chips and also the ramp-up of the Blackwell data centre chipset, where there have been reports of teething troubles.

“There are two other numbers worth watching, though, especially in light of Super Micro’s profit warning. Remember that analysts used to say that Super Micro was a good proxy for demand for NVIDIA and AI-related chipsets, a comment we have heard less frequently of late, especially following the resignation of the company’s auditor, delays in the releases of quarterly regulatory filings and write-downs against the value of inventory on its balance sheet – presumably older-generation chipsets.

Source: Company accounts. Financial year to June.

“If a company’s big customers have too much inventory, then the danger is, at some stage, demand from that customer starts to slow, a trend which can show up in the supplier’s balance sheet, via both inventories and trade receivables.

“NVIDIA had to work through an inventory bulge in 2022 that did take its toll on profit momentum, but it has done a good job since. Inventory may be rising but given the strong sales growth that is hardly a surprise and inventory days are back to pretty normal levels, by historic standards, at around 87 days.

Source: Company accounts. Financial year to June.

“However, accounting wonks will note that way in which trade receivables are rising – this related to revenues possibly booked by NVIDIA but where payment has not yet been received. NVIDIA’s own website offers detail on the customer funding it provides (given the expensive nature of its products).

“Investors with long memories will remember how Cisco and some internet equipment giants provided so-called vendor financing in the late 1990s and how that helped to boost demand near-term but exacerbate the slowdown that followed as an investment boom turned to bust.

“That said, NVIDIA’s sales growth is currently so rapid that days receivable are not substantially above historic norms, though they are higher at 198 days against a five-year average of 157. There could be trouble ahead if customers start to slow their purchases for any unexpected reason, unlikely as the share price seems to think that may be.”

Source: Company accounts. Financial year to June.

Russ Mould
Investment Director

Russ Mould’s long experience of the capital markets began in 1991 when he became a Fund Manager at a leading provider of life insurance, pensions and asset management services. In 1993, he joined a prestigious investment bank, working as an Equity Analyst covering the technology sector for 12 years. Russ eventually joined Shares magazine in November 2005 as Technology Correspondent and became Editor of the magazine in July 2008. Following the acquisition of Shares' parent company, MSM Media, by AJ Bell Group, he was appointed as AJ Bell’s Investment Director in summer 2013.

Contact details

Mobile: 07710 356 331
Email: russ.mould@ajbell.co.uk

Follow us: