Why Wednesday’s post-Fed rally may have been a bear trap

Writer,

Archived article

Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.

When Jack Nicholson was playing The Joker in Tim Burton’s first Batman film in 1989, he was so well paid that he reportedly told a fellow cast member after just a week’s shooting, ‘Ah well, that’s another Matisse.’ Financial markets are starting to rack up some big numbers, too, but in this case the money is flowing out, not in.

After Thursday’s sell-off, the much-lauded sextet of Meta Platforms, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, Alphabet and Microsoft have lost a combined $2.5 trillion in market cap from their aggregate peak in December and – as the Fed and other central banks focus on taming inflation rather than supporting financial markets by raising interest rates and withdrawing Quantitative Tightening – there could be worse to come, if investors’ experiences of the NASDAQ bear market of 2000 to 2002 are any guide.

Why Wednesday’s post-Fed rally may have been a bear trap

Source: Refinitiv data

Back in 2000, the three biggest technology stocks by market capitalisation were Microsoft, Cisco and Intel. When the NASDAQ peaked at 5,049 on 10 March 2000 these stock market darlings, seemingly invincible at the time, given their strong competitive positions, booming earnings and robust balance sheets, commanded a combined valuation of $1.4 trillion.

By the time the NASDAQ bottomed in September 2000, at just 1,114 after a 78% swan dive, Microsoft, Cisco and Intel’s aggregate value had fallen by 62%, or $929 billion.

That felt like a lot of money at that time.

Investors may smile, safe in the knowledge that Microsoft alone still has a stock market price tag of $2.1 trillion on its own today.

But of the 2000 peak’s three tech titans, Microsoft is the only one whose shares trade higher now than they did then. Cisco and Intel still trade some 38% below their 2000 highs. And anyone who toughed it out with Microsoft had to be supremely patient. Anyone unlucky enough to have paid the top-tick of $55.90 had to wait until December 2015 before they got their money back.

Why Wednesday’s post-Fed rally may have been a bear trap

Source: Refinitiv data

Worse still, there were multiple rallies in those big names, which only served to lure investors into further trouble. A quick look at how the market caps of Microsoft, Cisco and Intel changed from the start of 2000 to the end of 2002, when a recovery was firmly in place, reveals at least half a dozen major rallies, either as investors bought on the dips or hedge funds closed out their shorts, or both. But the net result was just more portfolio pain – and that was at a time when the Federal Reserve was frantically slashing rates, not raising them.

Why Wednesday’s post-Fed rally may have been a bear trap

Source: Refinitiv data

Thankfully the past is no guarantee for future. But the way in which Wednesday’s rally quickly gave way to a fresh rout on Thursday may not have been a good sign, as relief that the Fed raised interest rates by just 0.50%, and not 0.75%, and that QT would only start very gently in June, swiftly dissipated.

The Meta, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, Alphabet and Microsoft sextet now carries a valuation of less than $8 trillion for the first time since March 2021. And if you just take the combined value of the three biggest – Apple, Microsoft and Alphabet - even they have lost 18%, or $1.5 trillion, since December.

A comparison of the combined market caps of Microsoft, Cisco and Intel from 3 January 2000 onwards and the aggregate valuation of Apple, Microsoft and Alphabet from 3 January 2022 onwards could be an interesting test of sentiment going forwards.

Why Wednesday’s post-Fed rally may have been a bear trap

Source: Refinitiv data

These articles are for information purposes only and are not a personal recommendation or advice.


russmould's picture
Written by:
Russ Mould

Russ Mould has 28 years' experience of the capital markets. He started at Scottish Equitable in 1991 as a fund manager and in 1993 he joined SG Warburg, now part of UBS investment bank, where he worked as equity analyst covering the technology sector for 12 years. Russ joined Shares in November 2005 as technology correspondent and became Editor of the magazine in July 2008. Following the acquisition of Shares' parent company, MSM Media by AJ Bell Group, he was appointed AJ Bell’s Investment Director in summer 2013.